Hey Guys I have a S&W model 66-4 round butt with a 4" barrel I know the -4 was made between 1994 and 1997 however I don't know when exactly. Anybody know how to date one by serial number?
Good morning, sir. I come out of hiding for stuff like this. You know how much I like the thrill of the chase.Gunny G said:Wow, nice S&W
LOL,
There he is!:bowdown:
Hey Brother!
It's funny you mention that about the CAA prefix...everything I find about the CAA 66-4 comes back to it being a THREE inch barrel. Wonder if this started life as a three incher and had the barrel swapped.raleigh_reloader said:To the original poster ...
... the Standard Catalog of Smith & Wesson doesn't list the CAA serial number prefix. So I'm going to guess in the late 1994 to early 1995 range.
But it's important to remember that serial number assignments were not normally all that sequential. And, that a gun could sit in S&W's vaults for months (years?) before being shipped, so it's anyone's guess when it actually arrived in the dealer's hands.
The only way to know for sure would be to request a factory letter. They cost $50, and the last I checked the waiting time is around three months.
Mike
PS - sometimes you can call S&W's customer service and get them to look up the shipping date. I've had varying luck with that.
Is there any correlation between the serial number prefix and the configuration? I'd imagine that any correlation would only relate to a particular production run. I'm not an expert on K frames, so I guess anything is possible.august1410 said:It's funny you mention that about the CAA prefix...everything I find about the CAA 66-4 comes back to it being a THREE inch barrel. Wonder if this started life as a three incher and had the barrel swapped.
I'd like to see under the grips to see the stampings on the frame.
I am thinking this because I have never seen a 66 round butt with a 4 inch barrel. I would bet dollars to donuts the barrel has been replaced. If it has, the three incher is far more valuable.....while a round butt 66 with a 4 inch barrel is interesting, it kills any value because the original gun has been altered.august1410 said:It's funny you mention that about the CAA prefix...everything I find about the CAA 66-4 comes back to it being a THREE inch barrel. Wonder if this started life as a three incher and had the barrel swapped.raleigh_reloader said:To the original poster ...
... the Standard Catalog of Smith & Wesson doesn't list the CAA serial number prefix. So I'm going to guess in the late 1994 to early 1995 range.
But it's important to remember that serial number assignments were not normally all that sequential. And, that a gun could sit in S&W's vaults for months (years?) before being shipped, so it's anyone's guess when it actually arrived in the dealer's hands.
The only way to know for sure would be to request a factory letter. They cost $50, and the last I checked the waiting time is around three months.
Mike
PS - sometimes you can call S&W's customer service and get them to look up the shipping date. I've had varying luck with that.
I'd like to see under the grips to see the stampings on the frame.
You know your K frames a lot better than I do. Thanks for sharing.august1410 said:I am thinking this because I have never seen a 66 round butt with a 4 inch barrel. I would bet dollars to donuts the barrel has been replaced. If it has, the three incher is far more valuable.....while a round butt 66 with a 4 inch barrel is interesting, it kills any value because the original gun has been altered.
Thanks! Asperger's has its benefits.raleigh_reloader said:You know your K frames a lot better than I do. Thanks for sharing.august1410 said:I am thinking this because I have never seen a 66 round butt with a 4 inch barrel. I would bet dollars to donuts the barrel has been replaced. If it has, the three incher is far more valuable.....while a round butt 66 with a 4 inch barrel is interesting, it kills any value because the original gun has been altered.
Mike
LOLaugust1410 said:Thanks! Asperger's has its benefits.raleigh_reloader said:You know your K frames a lot better than I do. Thanks for sharing.
Mike![]()