I got a Rossi Circuit Judge on August 7th. I took it to the range last week, and Here's a brief review. Well I am pretty bad at writing anything brief, but here goes. Overall, I really love the circuit judge for several different things, and I dislike it for a few nagging things.
I think the most important thing in reviewing any weapon is figuring out what it is good for... What am I going to use it for? What is it good for? And - with regards to that, how does it compare to its competition?
I bought the Circuit Judge for a bunch of different things. I wanted it to work as a compact, light, home defense weapon, a light shotgun, a weapon to help train a recoil-averse person about shotguns and high-powered rifles, and potentially a rifle for deer hunting. In short, I wanted it because I expect it to be extremely versatile. In that regard, it is outstanding, pretty unique, and I can't say this enough - it is ALOT of fun to shoot!
For home defense, I think the Circuit Judge is excellent. It fires 45 Colt (45 Long Colt) and 410. 45 colt has stopped people and horses for well over a hundred years. Winchester, Federal and Remington have 410 loads with four or five 00 or 000 Buck pellets that are probably similar, ballistically, to 4 or 5 simultaneous rounds from a 32, 38 or 9mm. Of course a 12g is more devasting, but I think that 5 rounds of 410 would quickly stop people breaking in or attacking. I have read that the Taurus Judge pistol has questionable ballistics. I believe the Circuit Judge ballistics are much better because of its 18.5" barrel.
I got the carbine for $499 plus tax at Windy Hill Trading Post in Elkin - which I highly recommend if you are in the area. Before buying it, I read and watched several reviews. including Jeff Quinn at Gun Digest and (the late) Dan Shideler at Gun Digest( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQrKslKjuZ4 ) and others.
This past weekend, I took it to the range with a person who is really averse to recoil. She and I had a blast shooting 45 Colt out of the Circuit Judge. She wasn't so happy with the 410. It was noticably more recoil, and noise.
The Circuit Judge was extremely accurate. I wouldn't say this was anywhere near minute of angle accurate, but I did shoot two 5 round groups at 25 yards where all 5 holes touched, standing, with stock sights and two eyes that aren't nearly as good as they once were. The 45 colt makes a big hole in a target, so they were probably 1 1/2 inch groups. This isn't military-sniper accurate, but considering the enormous jump the lead has to make before arriving at the barrel, see pic I was thrilled at the results. It has excellent sights, (see pic) and a high comb that meets the cheek perfectly. Those combined with the generous recoil pad make it a real joy to shoot, and amazingly accurate, for a short barreled revolver-based carbine. I think it is very well made. the quality of the stock, forearm, and sights is really great. I think those things are much higher quality than what I paid for.
It is a very light weapon, 4 3/4 lbs or so, and has sling swivels. Given the accuracy, and the power of the 45 colt, I think it will make an excellent deer rifle up to 150 yds or so. I may put a red dot on it... I'm not sure.
Here are the things that I do NOT like about it. The design of the stock and extractors means that you cannot extract all 5 rounds at the same time. It also means that there's no way you could do a quick reload with a speedloader. Maybe speed-strips would work. Two problems: the extractor is too short to extract shotgun shells and the stock extends too close to the extractor when it is pushed. Here are some pics:
I think that sanding down the stock by 1/8 of an inch would make an enormous difference.
If I can figure out how to match the stock where I sand it to the rest, color wise, I will probably do that.
I also REALLY don't like the cost of 45 Colt ammo. That's not the fault of the weapon, but it is a factor. 50 rounds of the cheapest budget ammo out there is $26 to $30.
All in all - if you want if you want a high-value, short, light, handy, carbine that does many things and is an absolute blast to shoot, this is it. If you want a perfectly engineered, designed, produced weapon that fires cheap ammunition this isn't it.

I think the most important thing in reviewing any weapon is figuring out what it is good for... What am I going to use it for? What is it good for? And - with regards to that, how does it compare to its competition?
I bought the Circuit Judge for a bunch of different things. I wanted it to work as a compact, light, home defense weapon, a light shotgun, a weapon to help train a recoil-averse person about shotguns and high-powered rifles, and potentially a rifle for deer hunting. In short, I wanted it because I expect it to be extremely versatile. In that regard, it is outstanding, pretty unique, and I can't say this enough - it is ALOT of fun to shoot!
For home defense, I think the Circuit Judge is excellent. It fires 45 Colt (45 Long Colt) and 410. 45 colt has stopped people and horses for well over a hundred years. Winchester, Federal and Remington have 410 loads with four or five 00 or 000 Buck pellets that are probably similar, ballistically, to 4 or 5 simultaneous rounds from a 32, 38 or 9mm. Of course a 12g is more devasting, but I think that 5 rounds of 410 would quickly stop people breaking in or attacking. I have read that the Taurus Judge pistol has questionable ballistics. I believe the Circuit Judge ballistics are much better because of its 18.5" barrel.
I got the carbine for $499 plus tax at Windy Hill Trading Post in Elkin - which I highly recommend if you are in the area. Before buying it, I read and watched several reviews. including Jeff Quinn at Gun Digest and (the late) Dan Shideler at Gun Digest( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQrKslKjuZ4 ) and others.
This past weekend, I took it to the range with a person who is really averse to recoil. She and I had a blast shooting 45 Colt out of the Circuit Judge. She wasn't so happy with the 410. It was noticably more recoil, and noise.
The Circuit Judge was extremely accurate. I wouldn't say this was anywhere near minute of angle accurate, but I did shoot two 5 round groups at 25 yards where all 5 holes touched, standing, with stock sights and two eyes that aren't nearly as good as they once were. The 45 colt makes a big hole in a target, so they were probably 1 1/2 inch groups. This isn't military-sniper accurate, but considering the enormous jump the lead has to make before arriving at the barrel, see pic I was thrilled at the results. It has excellent sights, (see pic) and a high comb that meets the cheek perfectly. Those combined with the generous recoil pad make it a real joy to shoot, and amazingly accurate, for a short barreled revolver-based carbine. I think it is very well made. the quality of the stock, forearm, and sights is really great. I think those things are much higher quality than what I paid for.


It is a very light weapon, 4 3/4 lbs or so, and has sling swivels. Given the accuracy, and the power of the 45 colt, I think it will make an excellent deer rifle up to 150 yds or so. I may put a red dot on it... I'm not sure.
Here are the things that I do NOT like about it. The design of the stock and extractors means that you cannot extract all 5 rounds at the same time. It also means that there's no way you could do a quick reload with a speedloader. Maybe speed-strips would work. Two problems: the extractor is too short to extract shotgun shells and the stock extends too close to the extractor when it is pushed. Here are some pics:


I also REALLY don't like the cost of 45 Colt ammo. That's not the fault of the weapon, but it is a factor. 50 rounds of the cheapest budget ammo out there is $26 to $30.
All in all - if you want if you want a high-value, short, light, handy, carbine that does many things and is an absolute blast to shoot, this is it. If you want a perfectly engineered, designed, produced weapon that fires cheap ammunition this isn't it.